|
Encore ...
Encore: New, exceptionally strong and capable of enormous power. It is
at least a pound heavier than the Contender, bigger and usually needs a
trigger job to enable the shooter to achieve its excellent inherent
accuracy. It is capable of handling pressures far higher than the
Contender. The factory 308 in the Encore is about equal to the 309 JDJ
ballistically but cannot be chambered in the Contender. In SSK Encore
barrels, any cartridge with the case head size and pressure level of the
300 Win mag can be safely chambered. The 300 and 338 Win mag are
reasonably popular, as is the 375 H & H. Increasing the case head size
beyond this means you must reduce pressure. Cartridges such as the 470
nitro in factory pressure levels are acceptable to the Encore. The 375 H &
H , 416 Taylor (416/458) and 416/348 JDJ are worth consideration for
really big game, and the 500 Alaskan is popular as are several other 50s.
The 458 Win. is OK but only acceptable to hardened shooters.
The
Encore is the result of the evolution of the Contender and the TCR rifle.
The T/C design team is responsible for the development and introduction of
the Encore.
The
Encore is bigger, stronger and heavier than the Contender. These
differences will be considered both advantages and disadvantages when
comparisons are made with the Contender. The Encore is capable of handling
a large number of cartridges commonly considered suitable for only bolt
action or single shot rifles such as the Ruger #1.
The
frame of the Encore is an investment casting - just as is the Contender.
Its design prevents it from being machined. The first frames were made
from two blocks of steel machined to accept the internal parts and
configured to the outside profile desired. The two halves were then welded
together, internal parts fabricated and assembled, mated with a barrel and
the Encore was born. Several guns - experimental prototype - were
assembled this way for testing. SSK was invited to test some of these guns
and shot them until a problem developed and then returned it to the
factory for examination. In this manner the mechanism was debugged by the
factory. Initial accuracy was excellent, although it has gotten better. We
shot one of these experimental frames testing various parts until its
welds began to fail. After these first few guns the frame design was
deemed suitable, and investment frames were cast. More testing by
shooting, not just computer testing, was done. You would probably be
amazed at what the gun was subjected to prior to it ever being
manufactured and marketed. Later, a stainless frame was developed and
produced.
I feel
that all cartridges of the casehead size and pressure range of the .300
Winchester Magnum can safely be chambered in the Thompson/Center and SSK
barrels for the Encore.
Many
larger cartridges that develop lower pressures than those in the pressure
range of the .300 Win Mag may also be chambered in the Encore. If the
cartridges are larger in diameter then the 300 Mag, pressures must be
reduced in relation to cartridge diameter. Also, many of the larger
diameter cartridge cases are not capable of handling the pressures
generated by the Win Mag. SSK has a good idea of what is suitable for the
ENCORE and also what isn't. We have tested it with a large variety of
calibers. Remember, this is a break open action design--not a large, heavy
bolt action firearm.
The
Encore weighs approximately one pound more than the Contender, and this
weight is welcome in helping absorb recoil of hard recoiling cartridges.
The action of the Encore is significantly different from that of the
Contender. I don't believe the trigger pull of the Encore will ever match
that of the Contender, but a good trigger pull can be achieved with the
Encore. Beware of those snake oil salesman who advertise very light Encore
trigger pulls. They may give ignition and safety problems.
In
comparison, the trigger pull of a Contender can be considered "excellent"
while that of the Encore would fall into the "good-to-very-good" class
after being worked over by a competent gunsmith. The accuracy of both guns
is superb. No significant differences in inherent accuracy will be found.
One
significant advantage of the Encore is its ability to handle a large
number of factory rifle cartridges which give quite high performance
without the necessity of reloading. However, significant ballistic
advantages are still available to the hand loader/wildcatter.
Not to
be forgotten is the fact that SSK chambers Encore barrels for all
significant military cartridges which may be purchased quite cheaply on
the surplus market. Many of them give superb performance.
Interestingly, our tests indicate a great deal of military surplus ammo
produces far better accuracy when fired in the Encore than it does when
fired in excellent condition rifles chambered for the same ammunition.
The
6.5 Mini-Dreadnought is a short necked 60 degree shoulder 220 swift case.
(Ditto the 257M-D.) It easily does 2800 FPS with a 120 and 2700 FPS with a
140 in the Encore. The 30-06 case has been given the same treatment in
280, 30, 338, 35, 375 and 416 calibers so far with outstanding results;
they equal the belted magnums ballistically, surpass them in accuracy and
case life while doing it with much less powder and far less expensive
cases. At this point SSK has about 300 reamers that may be chambered in
the Encore.
Interestingly, many of the old Nitro Express cartridges give excellent
performance in the Encore rifle. Their handgun barrel length ballistics
are easily equalled or exceeded by many physically smaller cartridges.
Obviously, if the Encore is developing all this power, recoil must be a
problem. Well, it is; and SSK has developed several highly effective
"Arrestor" muzzle brakes geared to the particular caliber and shooter to
negate that situation, and extreme power can be used with genuine comfort.
Also chambering . . . 376 Steyr
|